What’s going on behind the scenes

I don’t have solid information here because no one is talking on the record, but my impression from off-hand comments by legislators and lobbyists is that we are seeing disagreements between the House and Senate Republicans over spending.

The basic dynamic is the Senate Republicans (backed by Democrats) believe there’s extra money available to give to schools and/or medical providers. House Republicans (possibly with support from Gov. Dennis Daugaard) don’t believe there is extra money that can or should be given to those groups.

Sen. Deb Peters predicted just this in my Sunday story:

“I think it’s going to be a fight between the House and the Senate,” said Sen. Deb Peters, R-Hartford and chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

“Right now, without a lot of details, the Senate (Republicans’) proposals so far have matched up pretty well with the Democrats’ in terms of being pretty reasonable.”

Rep. Fred Romkema, Peters’ House counterpart, you will recall, was skeptical on the availability of extra ongoing money for schools and medical providers:

“We are in a very fluid state at the moment,” said Romkema. “That money has perhaps already been accounted for before there’s formal action.”

We’ll see how this sorts itself out. So far we’re seeing delay upon delay as caucuses and leaders meet behind closed doors to try to hash out this dispute.

Marijuana, fight commission top issues at legislative forum

Medical marijuana and regulating mixed martial arts bouts were among the issues dividing Sioux Falls-area lawmakers at Saturday’s legislative forum.

Nine senators and representatives representing districts 9, 13 and 14 took questions for 90 minutes Saturday morning, in the second of four legislative coffees sponsored by the Sioux Falls Area Chamber of Commerce and other groups.

One of the most controversial bills the South Dakota Legislature is considering this year, allowing schools to arm volunteer defenders, didn’t spark a debate on Saturday.

Instead, it was a bill to allow people charged with possession of small amounts of marijuana to cite medical necessity that provided one of the few spots of disagreement in the low-key forum.

Several lawmakers said they’re skeptical of the medical marijuana proposal, House Bill 1227.

“A case was made that you ought to be able to break a law, if there’s a higher good,” said Rep. Steve Hickey, R-Sioux Falls. “I would tend to agree with that until the higher personal good for you compromises what’s best for those around you.”

He said he worries marijuana is one of those cases.

Similarly, Rep. Mark Mickelson, R-Sioux Falls, said he was probably against the medical marijuana bill but expressed sympathy for people who use marijuana to treat chronic pain and other diseases. He suggested that prosecutors and judges use discretion to impose minor sentences in those cases.

Less nuanced in opposition to the bill was Rep. Anne Hajek, R-Sioux Falls, who warned that “marijuana is a gateway drug” and said she was opposed to any steps toward legalizing the substance, though she too said the state shouldn’t “throw people in jail for the use of marijuana.”

Meanwhile Rep. Marc Feinstein, D-Sioux Falls, suggested that leniency to small-time marijuana users was humane and would also relieve a burden on county jails.

Another bill, Senate Bill 84, has pitted lawmakers against Gov. Dennis Daugaard over whether the state should create commission to regulate boxing, mixed martial arts and other fighting sports.

A large majority of the South Dakota Senate approved SB 84, believing that the sports might be distasteful but that regulation can help protect people.

“What we’re talking about is a commission to regulate it so people don’t get hurt,” said Sen. Deb Soholt, R-Sioux Falls. “It’s happening in South Dakota. It’s unregulated. Because of that, athletes are getting injured.”

Hickey agreed with Daugaard that the bill would end up promoting these violent sports and cause more harm than good.

“Just because something is happening in the state doesn’t mean we need to legitimize it,” Hickey said.

Sen. Deb Peters, R-Hartford said she voted against SB 84 not because of distaste for fighting sports, but because of concern about the state’s fiscal liability if it created the commission.

South Dakota is caught in the middle, said Sen. Phyllis Heineman — “if we’re not going to have a commission that regulates it… then we should outlaw it,” she said.

Heineman came down in favor of regulating the fights and voted for SB 84.

Other issues discussed at the legislative forum included guns in schools, funding for Medicaid, illegal immigration and security deposits for rental apartments.

Visit argusleader.com to view a video of the legislative forum.

The third Chamber-sponsored forum will be next Saturday at 10 a.m., featuring lawmakers from districts 11, 12 and 15.

The PACs of District 9 (updated)

District 9 is notable for two things: internment camps for shellfish-like aliens, and one of the more interesting primary races for South Dakota Legislature this year.

Incumbent Sen. Deb Peters, R-Hartford, is facing off a spirited challenge from Rep. Lora Hubbel, R-Sioux Falls, who decided to challenge Peters after being redistricted out of her old district.

The two candidates have thrown harsh words at each other, but most of the dirtiest work has been done by third-party groups, who can fill voters’ mailboxes with negative pamphlets without putting the name of the candidate they support on them (thus insulating those favored candidates from any backlash from voters upset at negative attacks).

(Note: this article has been updated to reflect new information, near the bottom.)

Let’s take a look at some of these attacks, and who’s making them.

Hubbel has slammed Peters for being “pro-abortion” and “anti-gun,” and anti-Peters postcards have taken a similar tack. Here’s five cards (some front-and-back of the same postcard) from the same group:

These are stamped, “Paid for by Conservatives United.”

Who is Conservatives United? They’ve got a page on Secretary of State Jason Gant’s new campaign finance system, though there’s not too much there.

Conservatives United is run by a Brian Wellhouse of Watertown. The political action committee hasn’t filed a pre-primary report (or it hasn’t been uploaded yet), so we can’t yet see who’s donated to Conservatives United or what they’ve spent their money on. Its mission statement is to “support conservatives in GOP primary elections.”

Another, slightly more transparent group has also sent out anti-Peters postcards:

Those postcards have a little more sophisticated design, but generally hit the same theme: Peters is an enemy on key conservative issues. This group, the Conservative Values PAC, focuses on health care rather than the abortion- and gun-focused cards Conservatives United sent out.

So who is Conservative Values PAC? It’s on the Secretary of State’s website, and it has a more notable name running it: former lawmaker and gubernatorial candidate Gordon Howie.

The stated mission of the PAC is “to support limited, responsible government and the principles of conservative fiscal & family values.”

The PAC lists a single $100 donation, below the threshold at which donors have to be disclosed, and a $100 donation to the Hubbel campaign. Presumably, the expenses for this postcard (and the money to raise it) happened after the reporting deadline for pre-primary campaign finance reports.

But Peters has an “ally” against this onslaught of postcards:

These postcards are paid for by a political action committee called “PAC’n Heat,” which evidences a sense of humor with its punny name.

So who is PAC’n Heat? To the Gant-machine!

The chair of the PAC is a certain Deborah Peters of Hartford, and lists its mission as “to elected responsible candidates.”

If you click through to PAC’n Heat’s pre-primary report, you can see it reported one donation — $1,000 from the Salt Lake City company Insure-Rite.

It also lists three other notable contributions: $421.41 from “Deb Peters for Senate repayment of cost of postcard,” $424.40 from “Steve Hickey for House repayment of cost of postcard,” and a $424.40 loan from “Bob Deelstra for House.”

Peters, obviously, is the incumbent senator in District 9 and the prime beneficiary of these attacks. Hickey and Deelstra are the incumbent House members from District 9.

Neither man is facing a primary challenge, so neither man has to file a pre-primary report with Gant’s office.

EDIT: Hickey writes to tell me that he and Deelstra didn’t have anything to do with the attack on Hubbel. The contributions from him and Deelstra reflect an earlier postcard the three incumbents sent out introducing them to voters, he said. He sent over an image of the mailer he said he and Deelstra helped pay for:

So while Hickey and Deelstra are definitely allied with and supporting Peters, this would suggest they weren’t involved in the attacks her PAC made on Hubbel.

I don’t know what the connection is between any of those people and Insure-Rite. Peters is a CPA, Hickey a pastor and Deelstra a “sales professional” for Northview Campers.

So that’s the postcard situation in District 9: Peters, under attack by third-party groups allied with her opponent Hubbel, forms her own group to punch back — with the support from other, current members of the Legislature.

What do you think about the postcard wars in District 9? Is one side being nastier or less truthful than the other?

Beyond Daugaard’s endorsements

Gov. Dennis Daugaard gave more than just public support to the five candidates he’s supported in Republican legislative primaries.

According to Daugaard’s senior advisor Tony Venhuizen, in addition to statements of support, the governor:

  • Wrote a letter to the editor in support of Rep. Val Rausch, R-Big Stone City, in his battle with Sen. Tim Begalka, R-Clear Lake
  • Attended a “meet and greet” event with Sen. Tom Nelson, R-Lead
  • Gave Rausch and Sen. Deb Peters, R-Hartford, $500 each from his campaign fund

That’s on top of providing those candidates with polling data.

The other candidates Daugaard endorsed are Sen. Bruce Rampelberg and former Rep. Mike Buckingham, both senate candidates from Rapid City.

Daugaard endorses fifth candidate

Gov. Dennis Daugaard has now endorsed five different legislative candidates in Republican primaries.

The first three, reported a few days ago by the Rapid City Journal’s Kevin Woster, were all incumbent legislators facing challengers: Senators Bruce Rampelberg, Tom Nelson and Deb Peters.

The two latest are different ducks. One, Mike Buckingham, is running for an open Senate seat — against current Rep. Phil Jensen. The other, Val Rausch, is a current House member, termed out, who’s challenging an incumbent senator in Tim Begalka.

Read my Argus Leader story here.

Daugaard’s spokesman Tony Venhuizen said he didn’t see anything wrong with endorsing in an open seat, or with picking Rausch over Begalka. Even though Rausch is challenging Begalka, they’re both current lawmakers. They “can both be viewed as being incumbents,” Venhuizen said.

Should the governor be endorsing at all in party primaries? What about endorsing when it’s not a case of supporting an incumbent — or even going so far as to challenge an incumbent?

Perhaps more interesting is what Daugaard did before endorsing. Look for that in another post.

Copyright © 2011 www.argusleader.com. All rights reserved.
Users of this site agree to the Terms of Service, Privacy Notice/Your California Privacy Rights, and Ad Choices